منابع ارشد دکتری

۲۸۱۲|۱۸۱|۰۹۱۹ تماس تلفنی مدیر فروش از ساعت ۸ الی ۲۱
۴۵۹۸|۹۱۸|۰۹۱۸ تماس تلفنی مدیر فروش از ساعت ۸ الی ۲۱
۵۲۳۵|۷۰۸|۰۹۳۵ واحد پشتیبانی خریدارن بسته های آموزشی (در تماس تلفنی ارائه کد خرید الزامی می باشد)
در صورت منتظر شدن پشت خطوط توصیه میشود درخواست خود را به شماره ۱۰۰۰۴۰۰۴۴۰۰۴۰۰ پیامک نمائید.
واحد ارتباط با امور کاربران و ارسال سوالات و درخواستها           PhdAzmoon[at]gmail.com   
واحد فروشگاه پی اچ دی آزمون (کتاب،جزوه،سوال،بسته) store.phdazmoon[at]gmail.com

ارسال سوالات و در خواستها به شماره ۱۰۰۰۴۰۰۴۴۰۰۴۰۰
نمونه درخواست شما با پیامک حاوی متن زیر:
منابع آزمون دکتری تغذیه دام-دانشگاه آزاد-ایمیل معتبر خودتان را نیز ارسال نمایید-[آخر پیامک 1az4.com قید شود] جواب سوال شما طی چند پیامک پاسخ داده میشود

دریافت پیامک نحوه خرید با ارسال عدد ۱ به شماره ۱۰۰۰۴۰۰۴۴۰۰۴۰۰
دریافت پیامک شماره حساب با ارسال عدد ۲ به شماره ۱۰۰۰۴۰۰۴۴۰۰۴۰۰

روش دوم خرید پستی محصولات سایت آزمون دکتری :

خرید پستی محصولات سایت آزمون دکتری تخصصی :
www.09189184598.blogfa.com << وبلاگ خرید پستی محصولات سایت
www.09189184598.blogfa.com << وبلاگ خرید پستی محصولات سایت

- خرید پستی بسته های آموزشی، سوالات آزمون، فیلم های آموزشی و تحویل درب منزل|محل کار شما توسط مامور پست، پرداخت هزینه به مامور پست
- چنانچه محصولی را از سایت انتخاب نموده اید و لینک خرید پستی محصول درخواستی شما در لیست وجود ندارد، با مدیران فروش تماس گرفته و درخواست خود را اعلام نمایید، بین 30 دقیقه تا 1 ساعت لینک خرید پستی محصول مورد نظر شما ساخته و فعال میشود بعد میتوانید خرید را انجام دهید و هزینه را درب منزل به مامور پست تحویل دهید.

سایت آزمون دکتری : www.PhdAzmoon.Net
سایت آزمون دکتری تخصصی شامل جدیدترین اخبار-دانلود رایگان سوالات آزمون -دریافت مقالات تخصصی -راه کارهای تحصیلی -تبادل اطلاعات بین داوطلبین )
با عضویت در خبرنامه دکتری براحتی جدیدترین اخبار دکتری را از طریق ایمیل مطلع شوید.
خبرنامه دکتری : برای عضویت در خبرنامه دکتری تخصصی برروی لینک روبرو کلیک نمایید : عضویت در خبرنامه دکتری

خبرنامه کارشناسی ارشد : برای عضویت در خبرنامه کارشناسی ارشد برروی لینک روبرو کلیک نمایید : عضویت در خبرنامه کارشناسی ارشد

نحوه عضویت در خبرنامه پی اچ دی آزمون
۱- روی گزینه اشتراک خبرنامه بخش خبری (عضویت در خبرنامه پی اچ دی آزمون ) کلیک نمایید
۲- در صفحه باز شده ایمیل خود را در کادر مخصوص وارد نمایید (در کادر پایین هم حروفی که بصورت گرافیکی مشخص شده وارد نمایید)
۳- یک ایمیل برای تایید صحت آدرس با ایمیل شما ارسال می شود ، که باید ضمن مراجعه با صندوق ایمیل خود ، روی لینک داخل ایمیل کلیک نمایید. (شاید ایمیل ارسالی، به قسمت Spam میل باکس شما برود، لطفاً قسمت Spam یا Bulk را نیز چک نمایید)

Rob's recent search efforts have yielded unanticipated dividends. Following is a species-by-species comparison between conspicuously large trees Messick has recently discovered in heretofore unrecognized old growth areas of the Cheoah, Tusquitee, and Wayah ranger districts of the Nantahala National Forests.

Rob Messick measured the girths of 65 accessible trees along Joyce Kilmer's main nature trail. While Rob's measurements do not necessarily reflect the largest of the represented species in the 3,840 acres of the Joyce Kilmer preserve, they do give us a feel for the nature of that forest. Will Blozan and I have made measurements of larger hemlocks and tulip poplars in Kilmer, but I accept Rob's sample as adequately representative of the Kilmer forest as a whole.

The physical area of Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest relative to other areas of the Nantahala that Rob has been surveying is not strictly comparable. Nonetheless, a tree-by-tree comparison highlights the extraordinary nature of the new Nantahala old-growth forest discoveries.

Messick's data form part of a larger, unfolding story. Consider that it is now the late 1990s, and the Western North Carolina Alliance and the Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition, principally through Rob Messick and company, is making yet another series of major old-growth discoveries in an important eastern national forest. In under a year, they have done what the US Forest Service has not done in literally decades. Keep in mind that the Nantahala discoveries follow on the heels of mind-blowing Pisgah NF discoveries in which Messick and company confirmed approximately 38,000 acres of old-growth forest in the Grandfather Ranger District of the Pisgah National Forest1.

Consider that prior to Messick's report, Forest Service estimates of Pisgah old-growth were greatly understated. The Forest Service completely missed or misunderstood the Mackey Mountain site?an incontestable old-growth jewel of exceptional diversity. Example after example of misinterpretation by the Forest Service could be cited?and will be, for any who want the full story.

At the time of the release of Mary Davis' 1993 old-growth inventory2, Forest Service estimates of old-growth in the Nantahala, including the Joyce Kilmer preserve, was between 8,000 and 9,000 acres. Rob Messick's current estimate of what will be confirmed will probably exceed 40,000 acres. That is a four-fold increase over the amount of primary/old-growth forest that the Forest Service currently recognizes.

Messick's Nantahala and Pisgah NF old-growth surveys are the flagships of a far larger movement. Other forest activists (e.g. Steve Krichbaum of Virginians for Wilderness) continue old-growth finds in places like the Cherokee, Jefferson, George Washington, Chattahoochee, Monongahela, Daniel Boone, and Sumter National Forests. Forest activists in the form of grassroots environmentalists, mainstreamers, academics, etc. continue to carry the load. In recent years, our efforts have borne fruit.

But over the years, we have paid a heavy price for Forest Service indifference, negligence, ignorance, and incompetence. Strong words, but absolutely true. For years, the Forest Service had been chipping away at the old-growth reserves, presumably unaware of what they were cutting.

In the early 1990s, we began the discover the extent of their sins and challenge them on their knowledge. In those early conflicts, district rangers steadfastly denied cutting any old-growth. According to them, there was none. Were their misdeeds the more forgivable sins of ignorance and arrogance? Probably, for most, but the complete story has yet to be told.

Rob Messick's research of the William Ashe papers?a true Forest Service visionary in the Aldo Leopold mold?reveals that when the Forest Service holdings were first secured for the Pisgah, and later for the Nantahala National Forests, internal Forest Service estimates of primary forest were as much as 30% of the inventory!! Taking 30% of the 478,927 acres of Pisgah, and 30% of the 449,281 acres of Nantahala, yields over 278,000 acres of primary forest. I have seen areas consisted of steep drainages and shallow-soiled ridgetops, left unlogged due to the marginal nature of the woodlands.

Now, Cherokee National Forest in Tennessee, Chattahoochee in Georgia, and Sumter in South Carolina represent the same kind of terrain as does Pisgah and Nantahala. Even if a common percentage cannot be applied to these national forests, it is virtually guaranteed that not less than 10%?and possibly over 15%?of the combined acreage survived as old-growth at acquisition time (i.e. between 250,000 and 350,000 acres, in round numbers). Where has it all gone? The Forest Service has cut a lot of it, and we now know that a lot of it still survives.

I suspect there is over 200,000 acres of primary forest left in national forests of the southern Appalachians. Add approximately 150,000 acres of virgin timber in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and the southern mountains probably still harbor 350,000 acres of old-growth forest. If the central Appalachians are included, I suspect we can add another 50,000 to 75,000 acres of primary upland forest, most of little commercial value. This gives the central and southern Appalachian region a probable total of over 400,000 acres of primary/old-growth forest. From available information I had in the early 1990s, I had come to believe the region just described had between 250,000 and 300,000 acres. There is more.

That is the good news. Now the bad.

Given what has been the Forest Service's overwhelming timber focus, should it be surprising that we now face a planned Forest Service timber sale in the Big Choga region of the Nantahala that would impact some of Rob Messick's prime, newly "rediscovered" old-growth? The Western North Carolina Alliance, Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition (SAFC) and others are calling for help. We need to launch a letter writing campaign and request that the proposed timber sale be withdrawn.

For me, the Nantahala National Forest situation rekindles the deep emotions I felt during the long battle we fought in the early part of this decade over the Big Ivy watershed old-growth in the Craggy Mountain region of the Pisgah NF?an issue that is yet to be satisfactorily settled. During that period, I came to mistrust all the Forest Service's timber managers.

I admit that was extreme. I have since met some who are principled and try to be balanced. However, I was not alone in my mistrust.

Then came Jack Ward Thomas' ecosystem management concept. He acknowledged Forest Service mistakes. He also acknowledged dishonesty, albeit somewhat indirectly. We were promised a kinder, gentler Forest Service, an end to the greed, arrogance and dishonesty that had characterized the previous era.

Well, the Forest Service has made some progress, but sadly it has had more to do with the unrelenting pressure of environmental organizations and the multitude of law suits that we've brought against the Forest Service than with internally motivated reforms. I would take nothing away from organizations like AFSEEE. They were and are a force for refo